Apollo Magazine

The Skeletal Evidence for Florence’s ‘Mona Lisa Bones’

There may be more (or indeed, less) to the discovery of the 'Mona Lisa' bones than meets the eye...

Introducing Rakewell, Apollo’s wandering eye on the art world. Look out for regular posts taking a rakish perspective on art and museum stories.

Much excitement in Florence, where a team of experts (as they have been consistently described in press reports) believe they have discovered the skeleton of Lisa Gherardini, thought by some to be Leonardo’s model for the Mona Lisa.

The tomb raiders are led by a certain Silvano Vinceti, a man whose Twitter profile describes him as ‘dedicated to solving the great mysteries of the past’: think of him as a cross between Robert Langdon, the hero of Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code and Tony Robinson, UK TV’s go-to amateur archaeologist. ‘I could be mistaken’, Mr Vinceti told reporters, ‘but I believe it’s her: it’s a probability’.

The Rake can’t help but raise an eyebrow. Readers with a long memory may recall Mr Vinceti’s name from a silly season story five years ago, when the self-styled sleuth triumphantly announced that he had discovered the remains of Caravaggio in Porto Ercole, Tuscany.

The evidence suggested that the bones dated from roughly the period of the artist’s demise and yielded traces of lead, a substance commonly found in paint in Caravaggio’s day. This was enough for Vinceti to declare that the skeleton was indeed that of the Cardsharps painter.

Conveniently, the discovery fell on the 400th anniversary of the hell-raising painter’s death – quite a coup for Vinceti, and indeed for the local tourist board. Coincidence? According to Vinceti, he and his team ‘got lucky’. Others, however, begged to differ.

‘It’s a put-on that offends the intelligence of people’, one Caravaggio scholar told the New York Times. This was just one sceptical view espoused by specialists. Others expressed doubts as to Vinceti’s forensic evidence, and described the local authority’s undue haste to credit the story as ‘depressing’. Franco Cardini, a history professor at the University of Florence went so far as to describe Vinceti’s claims as a ‘wicked manipulation of the mass media’.

But back to the would-be Giaconda. Vinceti’s team have discovered bones that carbon dating suggests fit the period. The trouble is, they are so old that DNA testing is impossible, and the fact that the skeleton is missing a skull prohibits even rudimentary facial reconstruction.

Vinceti and his merry men have been searching for Lisa since 2011. Quite why they bothered, Rakewell is none the wiser. Even brushing aside the views of the sceptics, declaring that the remains might have belonged to a woman who might have been the sitter for a portrait (Vinceti, for the record, has publically opined that the inspiration for the Mona Lisa was probably a male model) seems rather far removed from the Rake’s understanding of the word ‘purposeful’. Goodness, some wags might even mistake Vinceti’s endeavour for a publicity stunt…

Got a story for Rakewell? Email tips to rakewell@apollomag.com

Exit mobile version