Rejected Riches: Avenue House

18 September 2013

The contents of Avenue House in Ampthill – the collection assembled by Sir Albert Richardson (1880–1964), architect, historian, writer, artist, teacher and sometime President of the Royal Academy – is now being sold by Christie’s in London. Richardson moved into the Georgian brick town house in the Bedfordshire town in 1919 and over the next 40 years filled it with products of the Georgian age he loved and understood so well. The result was not a museum, however; Richardson once described it as ‘a home, an office, and a university’ – a similar role to that intended by Sir John Soane for his creation in Lincoln’s Inn Fields.

The interior of Sir Albert Richardson's Avenue House

The interior of Sir Albert Richardson’s Avenue House

This sale is a sad and wretched business. Many of Richardson’s things do not look particularly impressive now wrenched from their context. The furniture and decorative objects will undoubtedly appeal to collectors but the paintings are not of the the highest quality. But that is not the point. What is now being sold and dispersed constituted a very special and personal tribute to Georgian England within an appropriate architectural setting. There was nothing else quite like it. And what is particularly sad is to see the architectural drawings that are for sale – not just drawings by architects like Soane but many made for Richardson’s own buildings, as well as some intriguing architectural fantasies. These are things that belong in the RIBA drawings collection.

Richardson may have adopted a pose in Ampthill – refusing to install electric light, dressing up in Georgian clothes and being carried through the streets in a sedan chair – but he was a seriously good modern architect. He began by promoting the Edwardian rediscovery of Neoclassicism and the works of people like Soane and Cockerell. After the First World War he intelligently adapted the abstracted classical language of Schinkel and other Neoclassicists to modern conditions and reinforced concrete construction in a series of impressive commercial buildings, as well as designing an extraordinary streamlined gothic church at Greenford.

Even after the Second World War, when he was perceived by the new modernist establishment as a traditional and reactionary figure, he showed great resourcefulness in his design for Bracken House in the City of London. Barracked by the Anti-Uglies when new, it later became the first post-war building in England to be listed.

But what is most depressing is that this sale need not be happening. Avenue House was lovingly maintained for half a century after Richardson’s death by his grandson, Simon Houfe, who was anxious to secure its future in the public realm. He offered both house and collection to the National Trust on advantageous terms. Negotiations dragged on for seven years, only to end with his offer being rejected.

The Big Brother House,

The Big Brother House, Channel 5

This seems incomprehensible; especially when this decision is compared – as many have done – with the National Trust’s recently announced intention to open, in a nauseatingly populist gesture, the ‘house’ created for the Big Brother reality television show. Of course there would have been problems in opening Avenue House to the public – as there were with, say, the small houses in Liverpool bought by the Trust because they were the childhood homes of two of the Beatles.

Albert Richardson was an intriguing and important figure in the architectural culture of Britain in the 20th century. He may be forgotten now – just as Soane’s achievement was despised during the half century after his death – but the National Trust should have known better.


  1. Having belatedly read an article from a december issue of country life I was prompted to look up more about Albert Richardson and Avenue House. The decision of The National Trust in deciding after a protracted seven year period not to accept the property is indeed strange.
    The article in Apollo Magazine rightly points out that collections such as this need not only to be seen in its entirety but also in context, in other words in the house where it was intended.
    Yet again I find myself disappointed by the National Trust.

  2. Henry Matthews Apr 6 2017 at 11:38 am

    It seems that beauty, good taste and all that is elevating is firmly politically incorrect. The “establishment” celebrates the ugly, banal and offbeat. The National Trust was merely following this trend. It is all the more important for us individuals who are of a different stamp to stand up for what we believe in.

  3. Dawn R Richardson Sep 12 2017 at 4:36 pm

    Shame that those with a keen eye, can be so rebuffed! He Obviously had taste and a love of Buildings and regency Style, I for one agree with the man.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *