Apollo Subscribe Collector Services
Architecture Comment

Boris Johnson and the GLA are the true vandals of London

22 January 2016

It’s a rich paradox that it was due to lobbying by Mayor Ken Livingstone that the Greater London Authority (GLA) and the London mayor were empowered to take decisions covering strategic planning applications into their own hands. Nowadays, they can supersede the borough (or boroughs) and give final approval or disapproval. Under the GLA Act 2007 some schemes would be blocked at the pass while others would be given the green light. That was the idea.

Now, in the dead of night, Ken Livingstone must question how it was that he delivered the perfect mechanism for his 2008 successor’s expansionist ambitions. Boris’s pet vanity-project may (or may not) be the silly Garden Bridge, but the roll call of his call-ins will mark him as a true vandal, putting Livingstone’s own carelessness with London’s skyline in the shade.

Over Boris Johnson’s two terms, a mayoral call-in of a controversial planning application has become synonymous with a green light. There have been 13 in all, the most recent in Tower Hamlets, on Monday. Thanks to Boris, at Norton Folgate a paste-up of pointless facades and a huddle of anonymous towers will soon become the latest addition to Spitalfields, regardless of the fact that it is a Conservation Area. British Land had already tried to wipe the slate clean around here 40 years ago and now it is back, basking in the sweetness of retribution – unless a Judicial Review instigated by redoubtable local activists (some of whom are taking up the fight for a second time) succeeds.

Photo courtesy Spitalfields Trust

Respectable architectural practices are involved in the Norton Folgate development, and some of them are also implicated in the lumpen scheme proposed by the Royal Mail Group (RMG) at Mount Pleasant. The site was once a smallpox hospital but its more recent claim to fame has been as the last undeveloped bombsite in town. Here was a chance to amplify and reinvigorate a central London area, to bring amenities and benefits to an existing, stable, and essentially mixed community, and to take something – at least in pattern – of what exists in the neighbouring streets of Camden and Islington and build upon that self-effacing, high-density urbanity.

In early October 2014 along with some hundreds, I took a seat at City Hall to witness the mayoral decision – a foregone conclusion like all the others. Royal Mail Group’s (RMG) urgent attempt to recoup value from their site had seemingly dictated nothing better than a cluster of high-value residential towers, with negligible provision of affordable, far less social, housing. Like thirsty giraffes, the blocks crowded around a dark gulch, the ‘landscape’.

Shockingly, it appears that the designers of the southernmost (Camden) element of the scheme were entirely unaware of the flourishing Christopher Hatton primary school just around the corner. Originally a London County Council (LCC) Board School, it reopened some 20 years ago due to the pressing need for schools in south Camden. An even greater need remains for a secondary school. But such important matters, the staple ingredients of any responsible citywide plan, were not the concern of RMG nor, apparently, even of the GLA. The authority, ironically enough the great grandchild of the LCC, even if born on the wrong side of the blanket, had already nodded through this dreary monotone outline-plan – doubtless offering sales to buyers in far-off places – several months before the Mayor handed down his decision on 3 October, 2014. On these grounds, surely, the GLA in its current form is not fit for purpose.

There’s never been a better time to subscribe to Apollo magazine. Start your subscription today with 3 issues for £10.

5 comments

  1. John Robinson Jan 29 2016 at 5:06 pm

    Should not the GLA be abolished and the money saved thereby be spent directly on social housing, libraries and arts, schools and care of historic fabric
    Late C20th giant bureaucracies have failed to deliver. They are part of the problem.

  2. I’d like to think that Norton Folgate may be Johnson’s undoing. The Spitalfields Trust and associated campaigners is certainly not going to go down without a fight.

  3. miss sara john Jan 31 2016 at 5:00 pm

    What does Boris think he is doing? There is NO POINT WHATSOEVER in changing Norton Folgate. Protect the History and fabric of Brick Lane and all surrounding streets. 17th 18th century buildings, Napoleonic, and Georgian Architecture, are singular in proportion and design, and it would be very cruel indeed to wipe this sort of Old Elegance Out of our Historic Characterful East End and City! I absolutely implore it all should be saved! In the 60s I used to live in Fournier Street, along from The Hawksmore Church, and the Clock always kept it’s time, and the beauty of St.Michael’s & All Saints, would make me gasp, even though it was covered up with barbed wire, had broken windows, a greasy spoon caravan at the bottom of the steps, and was truly sad, with only a broom stick cut to make a Cross in the interior of the Church. Opposite was the Spitalfields market, as it was, and far more interesting and successful than it is now…. Now it is simply Shoddy Stuff for sale and ever so boring….. A Shame!

  4. miss sara john Jan 31 2016 at 5:01 pm

    I am not going to lessen my paragraph. I Lived there, and loved the Area!

  5. John Robinson, who would be responsible for deciding to spend the money directly on the objects that you mention? How would you influence their decisions? The Mayor and GLA are at least democratically elected. The problem lies, surely, in the quality of candidates for elected office. Time will tell whether Zac Goldsmith, Sadiq Khan, Siân Berry or Caroline Pidgeon may show more cultural senstivity. I certainly prefer any or all of them to George Osborne.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *