The expansion of New York’s Museum of Modern Art will take place across five buildings. MoMA’s chairman, property baron Jerry I. Speyer, seems to be curating his real estate: deciding which architecture to display, and now, in a recent announcement, what to keep in storage.
The American Folk Art Museum facade will be stored, not destroyed, says MoMA. Photo: Derrick Noh
Out of all the proposed street-level changes, none has lodged more stubbornly in Manhattan’s cultural craw than the demolition of MoMA’s neighbour, the former American Folk Art Museum, which opened just over a decade ago. Alternative strategies were looked into, but the building proved too surly. Floors didn’t align. The old façade by the architects Tod Williams and Billie Tsien didn’t complement MoMA’s all-glass look. To many, the gallery’s plans have been trivial: an open-plan upgrade for the kitchen of Art. In an article for The New York Times on 13 January, Michael Kimmelman wrote:
A city presents endless constraints out of which creativity emerges, or it doesn’t. There were plenty of good reasons to raze the old Pennsylvania Station 50 years ago, but that didn’t mean that it was wise. It would be truly radical for MoMA to save the former folk art building, but that’s not what the museum has ever really been about.
Yesterday it was announced that MoMA was indeed saving the folk art building, but in pieces. Every copper and iron panel by Williams and Tsien are to be kept in storage. Many have called for them to be displayed or in some way reused, but the museum shows no enthusiasm about making an exhibition out of the panels.
I visited MoMA three years ago. I was staying in New York a few weeks before my university finals. I remember every place on that trip, almost every word that New Yorkers said to me; I remember the Guggenheim and the Met in detail, as well as a couple of little Chelsea galleries. I remember very little about MoMA, though, apart from the building next door.
AFAM The American Folk Art Museum Photo: Lauren Manning (Creative Commons)
Looking at the two structures side by side – MoMA and the American Folk Art Museum – which one do you think looks more radical? The shiny glass penthouse with sibling galleries in every modest city in the western world, or the crocodile-skin one with its heavy fossil sheen? I’d say gut the folk museum, demolish MoMA, and get Diller Scofidio + Renfro – the firm of architects in charge of the new design – to come up with a space which feeds into the folk museum structure. If not, auction the panels to people who care.
Or maybe if the new plans don’t work out, MoMA can painstakingly assemble a folk museum retrospective where it once was.
Packing Up: MoMA’s plans for the Folk Museum’s façade
Share
The expansion of New York’s Museum of Modern Art will take place across five buildings. MoMA’s chairman, property baron Jerry I. Speyer, seems to be curating his real estate: deciding which architecture to display, and now, in a recent announcement, what to keep in storage.
The American Folk Art Museum facade will be stored, not destroyed, says MoMA. Photo: Derrick Noh
Out of all the proposed street-level changes, none has lodged more stubbornly in Manhattan’s cultural craw than the demolition of MoMA’s neighbour, the former American Folk Art Museum, which opened just over a decade ago. Alternative strategies were looked into, but the building proved too surly. Floors didn’t align. The old façade by the architects Tod Williams and Billie Tsien didn’t complement MoMA’s all-glass look. To many, the gallery’s plans have been trivial: an open-plan upgrade for the kitchen of Art. In an article for The New York Times on 13 January, Michael Kimmelman wrote:
A city presents endless constraints out of which creativity emerges, or it doesn’t. There were plenty of good reasons to raze the old Pennsylvania Station 50 years ago, but that didn’t mean that it was wise. It would be truly radical for MoMA to save the former folk art building, but that’s not what the museum has ever really been about.
Yesterday it was announced that MoMA was indeed saving the folk art building, but in pieces. Every copper and iron panel by Williams and Tsien are to be kept in storage. Many have called for them to be displayed or in some way reused, but the museum shows no enthusiasm about making an exhibition out of the panels.
I visited MoMA three years ago. I was staying in New York a few weeks before my university finals. I remember every place on that trip, almost every word that New Yorkers said to me; I remember the Guggenheim and the Met in detail, as well as a couple of little Chelsea galleries. I remember very little about MoMA, though, apart from the building next door.
AFAM The American Folk Art Museum Photo: Lauren Manning (Creative Commons)
Looking at the two structures side by side – MoMA and the American Folk Art Museum – which one do you think looks more radical? The shiny glass penthouse with sibling galleries in every modest city in the western world, or the crocodile-skin one with its heavy fossil sheen? I’d say gut the folk museum, demolish MoMA, and get Diller Scofidio + Renfro – the firm of architects in charge of the new design – to come up with a space which feeds into the folk museum structure. If not, auction the panels to people who care.
Or maybe if the new plans don’t work out, MoMA can painstakingly assemble a folk museum retrospective where it once was.
There’s never been a better time to subscribe to Apollo magazine. Start your subscription now.
Share
More to read
Small Wonders: The Ingram Collection
The Ingram Collection is a private collection of modern and contemporary British art, on display at the Lightbox in Woking
‘Men in Pants’ at the De Morgan Centre
Life drawing and the mastery of the male form was an essential part of artistic study in the Victorian period. But what if the student was a woman?
Germany proposes a new law to enable the return of looted art
If passed, the law would remove a significant barrier for families trying to recover Nazi-looted items